![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
|
||||
| Introduction The characteristic macro physical properties of hyaluronan (HA), which distinguish it from the other components of extracellular matrix, are readily accessible to experimentation and have been investigated and commented upon for over 50 years. However, a complete understanding of the microscopic shape of HA and how this translates into the macro physical properties has been much more elusive. In this article, we review new analysis of the macro physical behaviour and relate this to the latest evidence for the molecular interactions that govern HA behaviour at the local oligosaccharide level. |
||||
|
Physical properties of HA at the macro level From its initial isolation, the properties of HA provided a challenge to classical biophysical methods of analysis, which were primarily developed for proteins and required that the properties approached those of perfect Newtonian solutes. The behaviour of HA in solutions even at low concentration is far from Newtonian, or “ideal”, and it required the talents of some very distinguished researchers; notably Sandy Ogston, Torvard Laurent, Endre (Bandi) Balazs and later Bob Cleland to make strong progress. Their work established a theoretical and experimental framework that provided a sound basis for beginning to understand HA’s distinctive properties;1-3 and see: Hascall and Laurent Hyaluronan: Structure and Physical Properties and Laurent: The Tree: Hyaluronan Research in the 20th Century, in this series.
Much of this early work was based on biophysical measurements of light scattering, osmometry, viscosity and sedimentation and this gave an evolving understanding of non-ideal behaviour and provided a basic structural model for HA that was consistent with results from the different techniques. However, it still appeared to leave the door open to various interpretations of what was the molecular detail of the conformation that caused the non-ideality. |
||||
| Confocal-FRAP analysis of HA diffusion In the late 1990s, Hardingham and co-workers made a big step forward in the investigation of HA by developing a new approach to the analysis of its properties in solution. This approach was based on confocal-FRAP to determine the lateral translational diffusion of FITC-tagged HA in solution5-7, (Figure 1). The technique is able to assess any factors that affected HA hydrodynamic behaviour, such as concentration, pH, ionic strength and temperature. Of particular importance for evaluating both strong and weak intermolecular interactions is that the technique is applicable to both dilute and concentrated solutions. It is also an equilibrium technique and is free of concentration gradients and moving boundaries, which can cause many artefacts in other biophysical measurements. The results could be interpreted based on empirical relationships8 established for the self-diffusion of polymers in good solvents and which reflect molecular entanglement of the polymer at high concentration. Further, the effects on the molecular domain of HA can be modelled using the Stokes-Einstein relationship to represent the hydrodynamic behaviour of HA as a sphere of equivalent dimension8. It was therefore ideal for investigating HA hydrodynamic behaviour and intermolecular interactions at equilibrium in free solution at both low and high concentration. It thus enabled us to provide a broad characterisation of the individual molecular properties of HA and the intermolecular interactions and network forming properties that occur when HA molecular domains become “crowded” and overlap as the concentration is increased. The latter was most important for the investigation of HA self-association, which might involve weak chain-chain interactions, as at high concentration chains would be closely spaced in solution and even weak interaction between chains would be more likely to be present. The confocal-FRAP technique was also suited to tracer diffusion measurements, which allowed an analysis of the way in which concentrated solutions of polymers impeded the diffusion of a soluble FITC-tagged tracer of smaller molecular size9. This enabled the apparent pore size of the “network” formed by the polymer in concentrated solution to be determined. |
||||
|
||||
|
The initial determinations of the change in translational diffusion of HA as concentration was increased showed properties that were well described by solution entanglement (Figure 2). This is a property common to all polymers in solution8. This implied that HA, as a polymer dissolved in a good solvent, such as water, behaved in a comparable manner to other polymers in good solvents and there was no evidence of intermolecular interactions at high concentration other than entanglement. The effect of ionic strength was also most informative, as it showed the great expansion of the hydrodynamic volume of HA as the ionic strength of the solution was decreased (Figure 3, 4)10. This reflected the polyelectrolyte effect of charge repulsion of adjacent carboxyl groups along the HA chain causing expansion of the hydrodynamic domain. The results confirmed that HA was a polymer with a highly expanded hydrodynamic domain, which was entirely compatible with the long established model of a stiffened random coil. The properties in absolute terms were also molecular-weight dependent and confirmed that many of HA’s distinct properties are most noticeable because of its great chain length, including molecules up to 10,000 disaccharides long. The diffusional behaviour of HA showed little change across a broad range of pH 4-8. However, in strongly alkaline solution (pH 12-14) the hydrodynamic domain appeared to collapse, which suggested that whatever stiffens the chains is lost at high pH (Figure 4) and under the conditions tested there was negligeable depolymerisation of HA and the effect was reversed on lowering the pH 6. This effect of alkali is possibly caused by some hydroxyl groups on HA becoming ionised. Interestingly, it reduced the molecular domain to less than 1% of that in de-ionised water (Figure 3) and the properties of HA became similar to those of a dextran of similar molecular weight. Investigation of the temperature dependence of HA self-diffusion gave unremarkable results and showed smooth minor changes in diffusion coefficient correlated with the change in viscosity of water with temperature. The result gave no evidence for a thermal melting of any intermolecular interaction of HA as might be predicted if there was chain-chain association. Evidence for chain-chain association was also absent in competition experiments with HA oligosaccharides. Self-association of HA molecules through chain-chain interaction would decrease their diffusion, whereas binding to short oligosaccharides would be unlikely to affect the rate of diffusion. In this case, the oligosaccharides should act as competitors of chain-chain interaction, but they had no effect on HA self-diffusion. The absence of any effect showed that HA hydrodynamic properties were unaffected by chain-chain competition9. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
The analysis of tracer diffusion of FITC-labelled dextran (2 MDa) within concentrated solutions of HA (930 kDa and >1 mg/ml) showed a concentration dependent reduction in diffusion6, which could be modelled as an average pore size of 135 nm reducing to 30 nm as the concentration increased from 1mg/ml to 10 mg/ml. These properties were largely unchanged over a broad pH range (pH 4-8) and they showed only small changes with ionic strength6. This is because the concentration of chains is unaltered by ionic strength and therefore the chain density in solution, which is the main determinant of the reduction in diffusion of tracer molecules, is unchanged. It follows that although HA hydrodynamic domain increases and its self-diffusion decreases as the ionic strength is lowered, this would have no effect on the chain density in solution as long as the concentration remained above c* (the concentration at which the separate molecular domains begin to overlap). HA solutions at concentration below c* are inhomogeneous as they contain regions of high chain density within the molecular domains, but also regions with no chains between the molecular domains. The rate of tracer diffusion in an HA solution below c* will therefore be a time average of the free diffusion rate outside HA molecular domains and the reduced rate within the HA molecular domains. At concentrations below c* there will therefore be a more significant effect of ionic strength on tracer diffusion as the molecular domains expand at low ionic strength and contract at high ionic strength. |
||||
|
|
||||
| Structure and dynamics of HA at the local molecular level Observations led those studying HA in the past to conclude that at the molecular level hyaluronan was not a totally unconstrained polymer. For instance, the polymer forms viscoelastic solutions at low concentrations that are not consistent with a freely flexible random coil, and secondly periodate oxidation of HA occurs more slowly than predicted13,14. However, much evidence also suggests that hyaluronan does not have a locally rigid structure. For example, hyaluronan is soluble up to very high concentrations, does not solidify, resists the formation of elastic gels and shows no evidence of chain-chain association9. Recent evidence from techniques such as confocal-FRAP (see above) backs up this view. How can we reconcile these two viewpoints? It is our hypothesis that these observations can be explained by a molecule that has an average local order in its 3D-structure, but with substantial dynamic flexing around this average structure. We will argue that this structural hypothesis is consistent with molecular dynamics (MD) calculations and with experimental data from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and it also explains the bulk properties of HA and its physiological behaviour and function. |
||||
| Previous 3D structural studies of HA The first glimpse of the 3D molecular structure of HA came from x-ray scattering of orientated fibres in the 1970s15. Rather than observing a single, well-defined conformation, environmental factors (e.g., type of ion, level of hydration of the chains) resulted in dramatic changes to the observed diffraction pattern. By analysing the diffraction pattern from the fibres, the helical symmetry of the molecule can be determined and, in favourable cases, one can make a basic model for the 3D structure of the molecule. In the case of HA, left-handed helices were observed that have two-, three- and four-fold symmetry with a pitch between 0.8 and 1.0 nm (See Sheehan and Almond, Hyaluronan: Static, Hydrodynamic and Molecular Simulation views in this series)16. In the majority of cases the unit cells contained single chains in parallel, but under certain conditions two chains could be observed per unit cell in an anti-parallel arrangement, which led to a series of general observations. First, the shape of the unit cell could be profoundly affected by the type of ion present, and it was concluded that this may be due to solvent shells associated with different ions. Second, models that were consistent with x-ray diffraction often had the distinct possibility of intramolecular hydrogen bonds between sugar units. Third, not all of the fibre diffraction patterns could be used to construct viable models. For example, the two-fold x-ray diffraction pattern observed at low-pH was never fully-refined17. Therefore, refined structures produced from x-ray diffraction should be viewed with caution, not least because they are conducted under non-physiological conditions and may be an artefact of the crystallisation conditions. |
||||
| Investigating conformation and dynamics using computer simulations While x-ray diffraction studies provided major insight into the possible local conformations of HA, such studies are ultimately limited because they do not directly provide atomic-resolution information; the resolved image produced is static, and the relevance to understanding HA physiology is limited. One of the possibilities to overcome these limitations is to use modern computer methods, such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Such methods attempt to describe the potential energy of the molecule through general empirical parameters that are calculated from theoretical (based on quantum mechanics) or experimental (spectroscopy) methods. Using these potential energies, local minimum energy 3D conformations can be calculated. However, realistic free energies can only be obtained by consideration of molecular entropy, which requires MD simulations that move the molecule over the potential energy surface. Furthermore, carbohydrates such as HA have a strong and molecular-level interaction with water, and this needs to be considered explicitly in order to understand, e.g., the dynamics of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. Such simulations, even for a HA tetrasaccharide require consideration of many thousands of atoms, are computationally very intensive, and thus have only been possible relatively recently. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Comparison of the dynamic prediction with experimental data In the IUPAC nomenclature (used in the x-ray diffraction literature) the average predicted linkage dihedral angles are as follows: for the 1-3 linkage C1–O3–C3–C4 is 128.5°, O5–C1–O3–C3 is -68.1° and for the 1-4 linkage C1–O4–C4–C5 is -112.2° and O5–C1–O4–C4 is -71.1°. This average conformation is close to the orthorhombic antiparallel left-handed fourfold helical x-ray diffraction refinement that was obtained from fibres in the presence of sodium ions. The average axial rise per disaccharide predicted by the simulations (of approximately 0.84 nm) is consistent with these models, which are among the most contracted helices observed for HA in the solid state. Diffraction patterns obtained from potassium or calcium hyaluronate fibres are more extended than this average, which were refined as tetragonal and orthorhombic unit cells containing antiparallel left-handed threefold and fourfold helical chains with axial rises in the range 0.89–0.95 nm. Although the conformations derived from these diffraction patterns are not consistent with the average structure predicted by the simulations, they are well represented in the dynamic spread, as discussed previously. However, the extended twofold helices with an axial rise of 0.98 nm, proposed to be fundamental to the biological properties of HA, are only encountered transiently and are restricted to short sections of the HA chain extending over one or two disaccharides. |
||||
|
||||
| Concluding remarks The unusual and distinctive properties of HA polymer solutions were established many years ago, but it is only more recently with the application new techniques that we are able to better define its molecular behaviour at the macroscopic polymer level and to quantify and model its behaviour at the local and atomic level. This has led to a much clearer understanding of how HA's distinguishing macro scale properties arise from the interaction of its local structure with the water and ions that surround it. |
||||
| References | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | . Balazs, E.A. & Gibbs, DA. The rheological properties and the biological function of hyaluronic acid. In: Chemistry and molecular biology of the intercellular matrix (Ed. Balazs, EA) 1241-1254 (Academic press, New York, 1970) |
|||
| 2. | Laurent, TC. Structure of the extracellular matrix and the biology of hyaluronan. In: Intersitium, Connective Tissue and Lymphatics (Eds.Reed, RK, McHale, NG, Bert, JL, Winlove, CP & Laine, GA) 1-12 (Portland Press, London, 1995) | |||
| 3. | Cleland, R.L. & Wang, J.L. Ionic polysaccharides: III Dilute solution properties of hyaluronic acid fractions. Biopolymers 9, 799-810 (1970) | |||
| 4. | Scott, J.E. & Heatley, F. Hyaluronan forms specific stable tertiary structures in aqueous solution: A C-13 NMR study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 4850-4855 (1999) | |||
| 5. | Gribbon, P. & Hardingham, T.E. Macromolecular diffusion of biological polymers measured by confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys. J. 75, 1032-1039 (1998) | |||
| 6. | Gribbon, P., Heng, B.C. & Hardingham, T.E. The molecular basis of the solution properties of hyaluronan investigated by confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophysical Journal 77, 2210-2216 (1999) |
|||
| 7. | Hardingham, T.E. & Gribbon, P. Confocal-FRAP analysis of ECM molecular interactions. In: Methods in Molecular Biology (Eds. Strueli, C. & Grant, M.) 83-93 (Humana Press, Totowa, 2000) | |||
| 8. | Phillies, D.J. The hydrodynamic scaling model for polymer self-diffusion. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 5029-5039 (1988) | |||
| 9. | Gribbon, P., Heng, B.C. & Hardingham, T.E. The analysis of intermolecular interactions in concentrated hyaluronan solutions suggest no evidence for chain-chain association. Biochemical Journal 350, 329-335 (2000) | |||
| 10. | Hardingham, T.E. Solution properties of hyaluronan. In Chemistry and Biology of Hyaluronan (Eds .Garg, H.G. & Hales, C.A.) 1-19 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004) | |||
| 11. | Balazs, E.A. Sediment volume and viscolelastic behaviour of hyaluronic acid solutions. Fed. Proc. 25, 1817-1822 (1966) | |||
| 12. | Hardingham, T.E. Properties of hyaluronan in aqueous solution. In: Hyaluronan Structure, Metabolism, Biological Activities and Therapeutic Applications (Eds .Balazs, E.A. & Hascall, V.C.) 67-78 (Matrix Biology Institute, New Jersey, 2005) | |||
| 13. | Scott, J.E. & Tigwell, M.J. Periodate oxidation and the shapes of glycosaminoglycans in solution. Biochem. J. 173, 103-114 (1978) | |||
| 14. | Cowman, M.K. & Matsuoka, S. Experimental approaches to hyaluronan structure. Carbohydrate Research 340, 791-809 (2005) | |||
| 15. | Atkins, E.D.T. & Sheehan, J.K. Hyaluronates - relation between molecular conformations. Science 179, 562-564 (1973) |
|||
| 16. | Sheehan, J.K. & Atkins, E.D.T. X-ray fibre diffraction study of the conformational changes in hyaluronic acid induced in the presence of sodium, potassium and calcium cations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 5, 215-221 (1983) | |||
| 17. | Atkins, E.D.T., Phelps, C.F. & Sheehan, J.K. The conformation of the mucopolysaccharides. Hyaluronates. Biochem. J. 128, 1255-63 (1972) | |||
| 18. | Guss, J.M., Hukins, D.W.L., Smith, P.J.C., Moorhouse, R., Rees, D.A. & Arnott, S. Hyaluronic acid: molecular conformations and interactions in two sodium salts. J. Mol. Biol.95, 359-384 (1975) | |||
| 19. | Almond, A., Sheehan, J.K. & Brass, A. Molecular dynamics simulations of the two disaccharides of hyaluronan in aqueous solution. Glycobiology 7, 597-604 (1997) | |||
| 20. | Almond, A., Brass, A. & Sheehan, J.K. Oligosaccharides as model systems for understanding water- biopolymer interaction: Hydrated dynamics of a hyaluronan decamer. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104, 5634-5640 (2000) |
|||
| 21. | Almond, A., Brass, A. & Sheehan, J.K. Deducing polymeric structure from aqueous molecular dynamics simulations of oligosaccharides: Predictions from simulations of hyaluronan tetrasaccharides compared with hydrodynamic and X-ray fibre diffraction data. J. Mol. Biol.284, 1425-1437 (1998) |
|||
| 22. | Almond, A., DeAngelis, P.L. & Blundell, C. D. Hyaluronan: the local solution conformation determined by NMR and computer modeling is close to a contracted left-handed 4-fold helix. J .Mol. Biol. 358, 1256-1269 (2006) | |||
| 23. | Blundell, C.D., DeAngelis, P.L., Day, A.J. & Almond, A. Use of 15N-NMR to resolve molecular details in isotopically-enriched carbohydrates: sequence-specific observations in hyaluronan oligomers up to decasaccharides. Glycobiology 14, 999-1009 (2004) | |||
| 24. | Almond, A., DeAngelis, P.L. & Blundell, C.D. Dynamics of hyaluronan oligosaccharides revealed by 15N relaxation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1086-7 (2005) | |||
| 25. | Blundell, C.D., Deangelis, P.L. & Almond, A. Hyaluronan: the absence of amide-carboxylate hydrogen bonds and the chain conformation in aqueous solution are incompatible with stable secondary and tertiary structure models. Biochem. J. 396, 487-98 (2006) | |||
| 26. | Scott, J.E. & Heatley, F. Biological properties of hyaluronan in aqueous solution are controlled and sequestered by reversible tertiary structures, defined by NMR spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 3, 547-53 (2002) | |||
| |
||||
| October 1, 2008/ Copyright (c) Glycoforum. All Rights Reserved | ||||
|
|
||||
|
||||